The following article was previously sent to: President Trump, House Foreign Affairs Committee, the Department of State, CIA and NSA
September 17th, 2026: We received a response from Senator Thom Tillis today. Thank you, NC ( & President Trump). We know what we should do for you and all the American people.
September 18th, 2026: We received a response from Senator Ted Cruz, TX. Thank you , TX, the Lone Star.
September 23rd, 2026: We received a response from United States Senator John Cornyn (R-TX). His perspective on international relations, artificial intelligence, and the future of the world strikes a profound chord, resonating deeply within our minds.
October 20th, 2026: We just got a new message from United States Senator Mazie Hirono (D-HI). As someone born in Japan who calls Hawaii home, Senator Hirono brings a deep understanding of our concerns, our dreams, and our love for both Japan and Hawaii. She shares our commitment to giving our very best to the Aloha State. Mahalo, Mazie.
We will work with universities and private businesses in the senators’ home states.
September 7, 2026
Subject: Strategic Recommendations for Improving the Non-Immigrant Visa Application and Interview Process
First and foremost, we wish to acknowledge the diligence and dedication of the Department of State’s consular officers overseas. They work tirelessly to strictly enforce Department policies, and we have no doubt regarding their commitment and meticulousness. However, we respectfully submit that the outdated policies they are required to execute should be modernized to better align with contemporary societal needs and the current international landscape.
To illustrate this, we present the case of a Chinese colleague’s visa application. We pose this question to any relevant personnel within the Department of State: When the Department’s computer systems and the assigned consular officer already possess comprehensive and highly persuasive information—including the applicant’s DS-160 form, the content of our business and technical websites, the applicant’s past and present international travel history, background check results, biometric data, and even the knowledge that the U.S. President has corresponded with us—what is the practical purpose of the current policy? This policy still mandates that the applicant schedule a new appointment and attend an in-person interview at the U.S. Embassy lasting merely seconds, and certainly no more than one minute.
Under current Department policy, the stated purpose of in-person interview is for the consular officer to determine visa eligibility within that one-minute window. The unstated, practical purpose appears to be merely verifying that the applicant is alive and in good health. We must ask: Can a brief exchange of two or three questions, lasting less than a minute, provide a consular officer with a factual basis to overturn the visa recommendation or decision already reached by both the officer and automated systems (AI) based on the extensive data already collected? We believe the answer is no. It is impossible to factually alter a conclusion that has already been established prior to the interview, unless the decision is based on subjective personal affinity or animosity. If that is the case, such a subjective decision would directly violate the Department of State’s own principles of objective adjudication.
If this is the reality, why can the Department not simply notify applicants via email? For example: “Following a detailed review by a consular officer and automated systems, your visa application has been denied. Please do not reapply for [six months / ten years / indefinitely].” Alternatively: “Following our review, we have decided to approve your U.S. visa; however, you are required to visit the U.S. Embassy solely to verify your identity and confirm your health status.” It is worth noting that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers conduct similar identity and health verifications upon entry into the United States.
Interactions between the U.S. government and global citizens, including U.S. citizens, must be built on a foundation of speed, efficiency, courtesy, strictness, and rigor. This is because the government is expending both U.S. taxpayer funds and the $180 application fees paid by foreign nationals. The current in-person interview policy is neither fast nor efficient; it is overly bureaucratic and formalistic. Furthermore, its effectiveness is highly questionable. We must not forget that many individuals who have become undocumented immigrants or pose threats to U.S. national security have successfully passed these very consular interviews. Conversely, many foreign nationals who could bring immense value to U.S. society and taxpayers choose to forgo visiting or collaborating with Americans due to the burdens of the current visa and interview policies.
Much like the consular officers, we wish to serve the interests of U.S. taxpayers, regardless of which country we are in. U.S. taxpayers are hardworking and great, yet often find themselves in vulnerable positions. President Trump emerged from this very demographic; his administration understands the challenges faced by American taxpayers and has implemented meaningful improvements that previous administrations have not.
Therefore, our formal recommendation to the Department of State is to collaborate with other U.S. government agencies, such as the NSA and the Department of War, to significantly enhance the application of Artificial Intelligence in visa adjudication. The Department could effectively partner with advanced AI technology providers to enable consular officers to more accurately and efficiently vet foreign nationals seeking to enter the United States. This could be achieved by utilizing AI avatars for real-time, online interactive interviews, or by requiring applicants to upload a recently recorded introductory video for consular review. Such measures would save applicants substantial costs, particularly time and travel expenses, and eliminate the current requirement of traveling to an embassy merely to receive a final decision. The American public has a profound understanding of the complexities surrounding undocumented immigration and visa fraud, informed by both positive and negative visa-related cases over the past few decades. The time for modernization has arrived, in alignment with the vision to Make America Great Again.
We have also submitted confidential recommendation letters to the President and the Secretary of State. We will not disclose the contents of any such communications without the explicit permission of the relevant parties, as a matter of fundamental respect and professional courtesy. For instance, without permission, we will not reveal the contents of a letter we received from a distinguished American leader. His humility and respect toward ordinary citizens like ourselves truly exemplify his greatness. In doing so, he has defined for us the core American values of friendliness, mutual assistance, cooperation, trust, and faith. This guides our actions moving forward.
If you support our perspectives and recommendations, we respectfully request that you forward this page to your colleagues and contacts within the Department of State, including those serving at the U.S. Embassy in China.
Alien Puppy Hawaii.com
usg @ Alien Puppy Hawaii .com
p.s.
The law is the law, and we, along with CONSULAR OFFICERS must abide by IMMIGRATION LAWS.
At the same time, we must convey to Congress that the current LAW needs to be amended, as the present inefficient, bureaucratic, and largely ineffective interview methods are completely outdated.
Furthermore, if those LAWMAKERS were to personally experience the so-called VISA APPLICATION INTERVIEWS in China, they would undoubtedly conclude that such INTERVIEWS are virtually useless. Due to the extremely short time allotted, severe LANGUAGE BARRIERS, and numerous other structural issues, the INTERVIEW is rendered fundamentally useless—yet this is exactly what the current law mandates. To put it plainly, this kind of interview process is a deception of the public and the Congress.
Until the current laws are amended, our foreign colleagues will refrain from applying for U.S. visas or visiting the United States, as a demonstration of our respect for and strict compliance with U.S. law and CONSULAR OFFICERS. If many foreigners share this perspective and adopt the same course of action, it would constitute a profound loss for American society.
The result is that this outdated law allows countless foreigners, who initially obtained their visas through a CONSULAR OFFICER interview, to evade or violate U.S. immigration laws from within the country via visa fraud or asylum applications. Many of these individuals pose a genuine threat to the United States. Therefore, our colleagues’ current decision to refrain from applying for U.S. visas is the ultimate expression of respect for U.S. law and the American public.
We have developed a comprehensive solution to resolve the current systemic issues surrounding visas, interviews, and immigration. This framework is robust enough to be directly incorporated as legislative clauses in future immigration reform. One of the key provisions is to limit the authority of CONSULAR OFFICIALS. They must be subject to strict checks and balances from both AI systems and domestic U.S. oversight/request/command mechanisms. Please note that this is a proprietary solution, and access to its detailed specifications is a commercial proposition, not provided free of charge. The Art of the Deal.